During
the period of the 1940s, the South underwent a struggle to define itself;
forced to choose between a future as a society stemmed within elitism, or one
that was aimed to destroy the current aristocratic foundation. Within Tennessee
William’s A Streetcar Named Desire, the
themes of race, class, and immigration all collide within a time where the
South struggled to truly define itself. Through the characters of Stanley and
Blanche, Williams demonstrates how Blanche’s resistance to Stanley emulates the
conquest and demise of the traditional South among the infringing rise immigration
and settlement of those considered to be of an outside, lesser ethnicity.
Between
the interactions of the two characters, William argues of how the elite Aryan South
unsuccessfully attempts to repel against the new outside race of immigrants who
threaten the South’s current identity. Upon immediately meeting, Blanche despises
all the things that Stanley himself represents, and the threat that his own
race and class pose to the status of herself and her sister. This opposition is
even referred to as the direct cause of Blanche losing her beloved Belle Reve, and
the beginning her degradation in class and the status of her own race. As she
yells to Stella, “I let the place go? Where were you-In bed with your Polack!” (Williams. Scene 1). Williams uses the opposition between Blanche,
a generational descent of the wealthy class and Stanley, a poor descendant of
recent immigrants, to demonstrate how the rise of a modern “melting pot”
America slowly diminishes the value of the traditional South. Blanche states
very bluntly her opinion of Stanley by calling him the degrading term of a
Polack. This effectively places Stanley within a lower status to that of
Blanche purely because of his Polish ethnicity, one that Blanche views a
impoverished and dirty, opposite of her own French wealth and aristocracy.
Furthermore, race is not only characterized through Blanche’s own words, but
also Blanche’s thought about Stella’s marriage shows her belief of an inferior
race threatening her own lifestyle. By insinuating that the loss of Belle Reve,
the DuBois’ beloved mansion, was completely avoidable by Stella having not have
been occupied and sleeping with her Polish husband, Blanche believes that her
own elite status of her race and the traditional South of which it represents
is deteriorated by even the most simple interactions with those of the inferior
race. As a result, in the eyes of
Blanche, Stella has betrayed her own French roots and the traditional South
through the fulfillment of her wifely duties to a husband of lower status,
affirming the Williams’ claim of how immigration allows for the once inferior
race to dominate the formerly superior, threatening the structure of
traditional society.
Beth- this is a really eloquently executed response. I found your analysis of the principle characters of Stanley and Blanche to be particularly fascinating. I think that for future responses your analysis would become even more grounded if you include more quoted material from the text to bolster your ideological claims. I also really enjoyed how you close-read not only the idea of language (in the form of racial epithets about Stanley) but also in the action of Stella's decision to marry Stanley. I think this is a crucial point in that Stella literally chooses to not continue this Arian-Southern line of aristocracy and instead elicits the choice to foment her own family dynamic with an immigrant instead (echoing the notion of a "melting-pot" which you reference). I also found your analysis of the rape scene to be well crafted, given, that is the scene in which these two social orders foment direct conflict with each other and in which one ideological mode (Blanche's) is defeated and utterly destroyed.
ReplyDeleteI too really like this analysis. It first uses evidence to further flesh out the thesis by arguing that Blanche's negative perception of Stanley is due to his race and then shows how that perception manifests itself into actions. The only potential edits you could make involve editing the redundancy in the first body paragraph and using more relevant textual evidence in the second body paragraph. The first body paragraph has a lot of repetition, mostly because your analysis is partially embedded in with your quote and then repeated. It may be best to just delete a few sentences. I too like the description of the "melting pot" though; it feels very modern. As for the second body paragraph, I would've rather the quote addressed Blanche's perception of Stanley. The narration of events in the form of quotations may have been unnecessary.
ReplyDeleteThis was a fantastic analysis. I like how you tied racial tension with the decay of how the South one defined itself, and how the intrusion of an "other" terrified those who were so desperate to maintain the old, dated definition of the South. This analysis made the character's intentions throughout the play much clearer for me. I thought the idea that Blanch eventually "losing" to Stanley representing the decay of elite Southern values utterly fascinating. You argued the point well, but just to make the argument even stringer you could use more textual evidence to really hit it home.
ReplyDelete