There are several
hallmarks to a Marxist critical approach, the most common of these being an “insistence
that human interactions are economically drive and that the basic model for
human progress is based on a struggle for power between different social
classes” (Gardner). In short, this means that humans do things for their own
gain, usually financial, and progress is the result of people trying to one up
one another. These points are easily applied to Franz Kafka’s “Before the Law”
in several different ways.
The first
thing that hints at a Marxist undertone is the relationship the man from the
country has with it, which is no relationship whatsoever. The law is set up as
this amazing thing that one should strive to attain. This mirrors how society
views economic and/or social success, people strive all their lives to succeed
and reach the next goal, but does that ever really end? There will always be
another medal to win, promotion to get, or record to break yet people continue
to try. In a similar manner, the man from the country gave up everything he owned
for the chance to get past the gate just like how humans strive for success.
Another
point for the Marxist approach are the characters themselves. The man from the
country and the gatekeeper obviously represent two of the possible social castes
and the gates after the first represent the rest of the possible castes. A
major principle of a Marxist analysis is struggle between social classes and,
in many cases, this struggle can be moving from one to another or simply
seeking to improve the social standing of a class. In this short story one can
see the struggle the man from the country goes through. He wastes his entire
life and all that he has worked for but dies no closer then the first day he
attempted to cross the gate.
Although
I found the Marxist approach an enlightening and refreshing experience, one is
best served viewing “Before the Law” through the tried and true lens of formalism
or new criticism. The message this short story is trying to impart is that the
law is not for men to decide or set. It is above our station and should be left
to higher powers. This interpretation is seen through Kafka’s use of
punctuation, sentence structure, and symbolism.
Kafka uses punctuation to great effect
The gatekeeper is one such symbol that Kafka utilizes. He is
an unchanging, seemingly immortal figure who is the same despite the passage of
time
While a
Marxist approach does offer unique and compelling arguments into the true
meaning of the excerpt it also limits the approaches one can take to the piece.
Nice job with your analysis I found it to be very insightful. I definitely felt that the Gatekeeper and the man from the country represented two different classes and that the country man was in pursuit of something greater. That is why I liked your explanation and how he is seeking economic or social success. I also enjoyed your formalism or new criticism interpretation. I felt this argued that law should be based upon religious beliefs or a higher power, not corrupted by men. This is reinforced with the magical power of the gatekeeper and his sense of all knowing. I really liked your formalism argument and would have liked to see you expand more on this idea. I also would have liked to see the incorporation of the particular parts that you mentioned, that demonstrate the use of punctuation to great effect.
ReplyDeleteReally nice analysis! I as well felt that the Marxist approach was a very suitable perspective to take while analyzing Kafka's work. The ways that you highlighted the relevance of social class and hierarchy is the essence of what Marxism is about. How you placed the most emphasis on the ways that the gatekeeper and the country man interacted with one another is a very powerful connection to make. With this being said, I do feel that a few quotations may help make this argument become clearer and more effective. But other than that I think you made some really strong points and connections in this blog! In addition, I did really enjoy reading your short review of the formalistic approach. This is one that I hadn't really thought of when reading this text but you made a really strong connection that I feel suits the text very well. Like your Marxist analysis, I feel that some quotations and direct relations to the text itself would make this point much more clear for the reader. All in all, really good work!!
ReplyDelete